>>12269760Exactly, it isn't a limitus test because it does cost me something, it costs me my time that I am unpaid for.
I worked at a lowes in college, it's actually way more anoying when people use the stall and stack it with all the different carts, then I have to pull out each one separately then put half of them back in. When they are all over it's actually less work to collect the ones I can push together.
Anyways, 3 validity problems are occuring here
1. Assumption that putting the cart back is good and not is bad.
2. Assuming that putting it back costs me nothing.
3. Assuming a false dichotemy where the most extreme bad option is leaving the cart near your car. This leaves other options out in a rather racist way that naturally the leftists don't consider because they lack critical thinking.
Other options include,
1. Not putting the cart back is part of black culture and should therefore be celebrated just like shoes on the power line.
2. Some people walk to the store and push the cart all the way home then leave it on the easement or nearby ditch. At least once a week or more.
These other options not being considered could leave people coming to racist conclusions, since most of the people that do not return carts may be one group. It could also lead to false conclusions through claiming that the worst people are those that still leave a functioning cart within range of a paid employee to retrieve.
In reality, the family on my street that steals a cart every week and pushes it 2 miles home and leaves it in the ditch, they are the worst members of society and goods significantly cost more because of them. Their race, is irrelevant because it is one family, but they cause more damage than if no one ever put carts in the stall. My local store has been forced to buy new carts every year at a huge cost and my neighborhood has spent thousands on waste removal over them. They are scum.
