>>12285361>You think the most plausible scenario is that the plane crashed at sea on its way, why?I started by dissecting the official version and realized that there was nothing in it. I had very good sources who had mentioned, from the start, the presence of two American Awacs (planes that function as flying radar stations) in the area and that the Americans know what happened. This source also first spoke to Ghyslain Wattrelos, a Frenchman who has lost part of his family. In 2016, I already had this information, but I didn't know what to do with it.
I also met an American military man who told me that the Awac's jamming capacity was "phenomenal". And I hypothesized that these two Awacs had simply scrambled the MH370 by sandwiching it. I found several other things, including the fact that the MH370's signal is gradually disappearing from radar screens in Ho Chi Minh and Kuala Lumpur, which is totally inconsistent with the idea that he would have turned off his transponder. Another element, the system called FlightRadar24, where we see all the planes flying around the world live, shows that when the MH370 disappears, several small planes around it also momentarily disappear, but they reappear.
There is another element that is consistent with that, which is that at 2:25 am, the plane's Satcom turns on again. It is in all the official reports but we have overlooked this element. Why the plane could communicate again? It means that the Awacs have freed themselves. At this point, the plane arrives very close to Chinese airspace. And it seems pretty consistent that for two American Awacs it is out of the question to enter it.
