>>1232783>allows there to beSo not allowing people to trade is freeing them?
>made through capitalSo someone agreeing to do labor for a price or trade they agree on, because they want to do the thing to get the thing they want, makes them slaves?
Because they're not being actively prevented by some vague, autocratic sky-daddy government from doing what they want to?
People must be prevented from doing what they want to and forced to live the way you decide they should which does not include peaceful, mutually-agreed-upon trade deals, in order to free them from slavery?
Duckspeak away this doublethink, please. I'm breathless with anticipation.