>>12427766I've not heard of any European dna found in North America.
But at the time of the beringian migration into America, people in europe were different than they are now, and not all that closely related to modern Europeans.
BUT
ANE contributed about 30% of the native American genome, and is also pretty high levels in most europeans. So that could be the case.
Indians are a mix of ancient South Indian (ASI) and ancient North Indian (ANI), and currently the best analogue for ancient South Indian is the natives of the Andaman Islands. ANI is related to like Iranian Neolithic peoples.
Australian aboriginals have at least 8% non human DNA (between their neaderthal and denosivan), and more than likely it's more than that. From an anthropological perspective, to me they genuinely look on the fringe of modern human, based on their morphology.
Africans are really really poorly understood. The most ancient samples we have are only 8000 years old.
Though there are remains from that time that appear to be human and archaic hominid hybrids.
My personal belief is that in some parts of Africa, there was interbreeding with archaic humans until quite recently. But I think it was mostly regionally confined.
There is evidence from statistical modeling of African genomes, that they mixed with something that was more archaic than the human-neanderthal common ancestor. But those studies details are questionable.
I garantee we will discover non sapiens sapiens ancestry in africans though
