[37 / 8 / 6]
Quoted By: >>12513733 >>12513734 >>12514119
This a continuation or next iteration upon the previous:
6: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/316077394
5: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315927864
4: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315925503
3: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315860064
2: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315806088
1: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315647889
---
TWO INTERESTING THINGS TO DISCUSS
1. keep educating ourselves on decentralised comms; both the philosophical as well as the practical
2. dive into the rabbit hole that is called Sam Maloney https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315927864#p316026637
---
1. DECENTRALISATION
What's up this shit? Why should you care?
>The whole human memory can be, and probably in a short time will be, made accessible to every individual. And what is also of very great importance in this uncertain world where destruction becomes continually more frequent and unpredictable, is this, that photography affords now every facility for multiplying duplicates of this - which we may call? - this new all-human cerebrum. It need not be concentrated in any one single place. It need not be vulnerable as a human head or a human heart is vulnerable. It can be reproduced exactly and fully, in Peru, China, Iceland, Central Africa, or wherever else seems to afford an insurance against danger and interruption. It can have at once, the concentration of a craniate animal and the diffused vitality of an amoeba.
H.G. Wells is literally talking about memes and why they should not be centralised in one place or rather: controlled by a select few.
https://sherlock.ischool.berkeley.edu/wells/world_brain.html
Is the solution to globohomo Technocracy a mesh network without hierarchy of individual human minds connected one to the other into one? Whenever this happens organically, globohomo is there to shut it down. Why is that /pol/? What did they mean by that?
(1/2)
6: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/316077394
5: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315927864
4: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315925503
3: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315860064
2: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315806088
1: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315647889
---
TWO INTERESTING THINGS TO DISCUSS
1. keep educating ourselves on decentralised comms; both the philosophical as well as the practical
2. dive into the rabbit hole that is called Sam Maloney https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/315927864#p316026637
---
1. DECENTRALISATION
What's up this shit? Why should you care?
>The whole human memory can be, and probably in a short time will be, made accessible to every individual. And what is also of very great importance in this uncertain world where destruction becomes continually more frequent and unpredictable, is this, that photography affords now every facility for multiplying duplicates of this - which we may call? - this new all-human cerebrum. It need not be concentrated in any one single place. It need not be vulnerable as a human head or a human heart is vulnerable. It can be reproduced exactly and fully, in Peru, China, Iceland, Central Africa, or wherever else seems to afford an insurance against danger and interruption. It can have at once, the concentration of a craniate animal and the diffused vitality of an amoeba.
H.G. Wells is literally talking about memes and why they should not be centralised in one place or rather: controlled by a select few.
https://sherlock.ischool.berkeley.edu/wells/world_brain.html
Is the solution to globohomo Technocracy a mesh network without hierarchy of individual human minds connected one to the other into one? Whenever this happens organically, globohomo is there to shut it down. Why is that /pol/? What did they mean by that?
(1/2)
