>>1260585Everybody's opinion on what constitutes official manlet status varies.
The ideal male height is consistently reported as 6"1 with some studies indicating 6"2 and then tapering downward.
Which means we need to set an average, or a baseline. I think it would be a fair assumption to say 5"10-6"0 would be a good baseline to establish for attraction (average) 6"1-6"2 would be an ideal, 6"3+ would taper down to near baseline or below baseline in terms of attraction (likely seen as too tall) and anything under 5"10 would be working against the man for attraction.
So Manlet Status would be anything below 5"10. Should they be euthanized? No they just need to find ways to compensate for the lost height. An attractive man at 5"9 who is in shape, has more money, is more successful, will be seen as more attractive then a tall lanky guy who doesn't take care of himself. Otherwise, why is Justin Bieber who is below 5"9 so sought after by women?
If you value yourself purely based on your height you are missing the full picture.
