Quoted By:
I was making a caveat about torture in my thread yesterday. Now I will make more caveats. For the people fucking with me directly, if I'm given a choice between killing you and putting you into the hands of people who want you for themselves, I will gladly give them that gift. If they want your children too, why would I deny them? Your children are nothing to me. Would I organize all of that sort of thing around the logistics hub at Camp Helene? Yes, that seems likely. However, if no one wants to torture the children of the guy that was involved in something ancillary, I will not almost certainly not order it. Even if no one wants to torture the children of the people heckling me when I go outside, I will probably not order it. For these sorts of second order people, ones first order disconnected from my torments, I will probably just kill them because my desire for expediency is greater than my desire to make a torturefest of my enemies and their servants and children. If people's hands will be full with their 100,000 sealed indictments, I will not increase their workload. For the most part, if you're not evil enough that someone else already wants to torture you, I will not order it. For my stalkers and rapists and the people mocking me, I think it will come to pass as it is written in Isaiah 66. You people that transgressed against me with your heckling and tapping and raping and stabbing, I think you will get tortured even if your children find a merciful death in my graciousness. However, if someone wants you and your children, and I find it is in the interest of justice to give you to them, then I will. Your children mean nothing to me even while I do not overtly desire the allocation of increased work hours for people to torture those they have no interest in torturing