>>12669503Not even that, the content of his post don't make any sense from a rational standpoint.
Why would the Rothschilds, Jews and the Freemasons want to fund and prop up a government style that directly opposed them and stood as an existential threat to their existence? Look at what Hitler did to the banks and Lodges in the years after his ascension to power, as well as the response after the war to National Socialism.
To this day, National Socialism is an absolute no-go zone, while Communism, an ideology 10x worst in every measurable way (Total deaths, impact on the country economy and birthrates are some) is championed and lauded .
It goes to show how shaken the kikes and their shabo's goyim were about National Socialism; it posed a direct threat, unlike communism or capitalism.
