>>12707124I haven't but I've watched some other guy who makes walking videos called rambalac. He just films though, no talking usually.
Yeah, that's similar to what this guy does as well.
>>12707140Lights off and volume at 200%. That's the true dk experience.
Word.
>>12707150Come on now. Are you really gonna argue semantics about damage to the marine environment and marine wildlife? What happens to the marine environment if you kill off all the major fish populations?
Yeah that's a fair point, but of course an impending threat is going to be splashed around on all the front pages while they can, especially when they reference a previous recent accident caused by the exact same program.
Treated water implies that it's been made safe which makes it less exciting but people are still watching and if there's even a hint that something is going wrong or can with a high degree of likelihood go wrong I'd be very surprised if that didn't end up in all the papers as well.
I think we both now I'm vehemently anti ccp by now. That news story literally just happened and the fukushima water dump isn't scheduled to happen for another two years at least, not to mention it's been deemed safe in accordance with regulations so it's not quite as exciting yet.
China with all its power and cutting edge technology could and should suggest alternative approaches if it's not up to their standards and so on.
Not the first but the scale at which it's being done is certainly record breaking which warrants additional scrutiny.
As far as the space debris goes those issues are very frequently talked about and are the reason why these regulations exist. The fact that china deliberately designs stuff that large with the intent to crash it back to earth without any control or predictable crash site doesn't compare I'd say.
Two wrongs don't make a right, isn't that what you're saying with the news stories getting uneven coverage?
Sleep well.
>>12707158How can you read and watch at the same time?
