>>12719259They're all just archetypes, conventionalized expressions of moods.
>>12719258It's fine. I already identified you before.
>>12719262I find them pleasing to look at.
>>12719255The "path" might be different, but if the conclusion that gets expressed ends up being the same as what somebody else said, then will what is being said really matter that much?
Would you hire two opinion writers for the sake of supporting the same argument? Would people even bother themselves to read both if they know the conclusion is the same?
