>>12736760>I guess that this Wittgensteins is another one to read(or at least to add to ever growing list)His Tractatus is just a couple of pages short of a hundred, not like its a light read but you should be done with it in one or two sittings desu.
>But i fail to understand how is the world relevant here.....Its not about perception, for Tractatus doesnt deal with such things, its about facts. Let me put forth an example of what i meant by stating my desire:
From the first few rules of Tractatus, we can say what:
1 The world is all that is the case.
1.1 The world is the totality of facts, not of things.
1.11 The world is determined by the facts, and by their being all the facts.
Therefore being distinct from the world would mean roughly this: let us say that there exists Fact X which states this and that, however if i come into a contact with it, it doesnt define me or have any reaction on me at all, neither i can do anything with it.
1.12 For the totality of facts determines what is the case, and also whatever is not the case.
By this i guess we can sum up the whole thing, basically i would be free from this law desu.
>I don't know if i make sense any more...Hehe....i dont think it does either...What madman would try to decipher the whimsicalities of a lunatic anyways? You`d go insane yourself sooner or later like this...
