>>12791111This is a problem.
You got quads. So we should listen to you.
But you're claiming that gets sometimes don't matter, particularly when they come from people one disagrees with.
But if that's the case, then I shouldn't listen to you, because I disagree with homophobes.
Which means gets do matter, which means I should listen to you.
Meanwhile, kot id is a higher get than quads anyway, which, in theory, makes it more credible.
But what to do when the particular less credible claim in question -- yours -- would undermine the credibility of the otherwise more credible claim?
I'll just put my foot down and decide your get is the get that doesn't count because you are a threat to the self-consistency of get logic, and therefore you must be rejected as if by a metaphysical immune system.
>>12791118roy id