>>12961064To those who ask and wonder why did they not use these advance weapons and craft to avoid defeat in Europe. This author response to this question of a commenter in the 3rd article provides the logical answer.
"Hello Mr Trotsky
(By the way, I very much suggest a name change.)
The Germans were not ‘SO’ advanced at the end of WW2 – but they are now. They were just finishing their haunebu and vril craft at the end of WW2 – and they did not have that many of them – some of them were not even fitted with weapons at that time. And I don’t think they had completed any cigar shaped mother ships then.
They also had a policy not to use any weapons in WW2 that they could not combat themselves – weapons that they themselves did not have answer for. Only when they had developed a robust defence against the newly developed weapons would they use it. If one of their weapons fell into the enemies hands it could cause them a lot of trouble, if they did not have this policy. Which was a wise move.
It was very clearly a tactical retreat to Antarctica and South America. They had to secure the future of the German people – that was their most important goal. And they have done that now. They have also collected DNA and now have a much larger, and even more gifted, population.
You don’t risk your newly developed technology. They had a small population and new – largely untested – technology. You retreat and regroup. This is common sense. (Count)
