>>12986624>>12986609Yes, I belive it is power tripping, or what I'd call "validation tripping".
>but i like the validation because daddy issuesThe truth amidst the fluff (to fake sensibility and for attention) is pretty surreal here. It comes right out of the horse's mouth, the motivation for it all: validation. I don't think this line in particular was a falsehood.
As a woman with looks, you can squeeze a guy, nearly any young guy, til' he's blue in the face, because he lusts so hard for you. This male lust validates a woman (and her beauty), and is exemplified probably by tens if not hundreds of times if the man you're squeezing is less desirable as well, because not only is he lusting after you, he is self aware that he is way out of your league, and the fall for his soul when you tear him apart is much greater. Therefore, if this woman has a "broken" mental faculty for "validation" in early childhood, she will look exactly for this thing. (Think, would you feel worse if you dropped a hunk of wood off a cliff, or a hunk of gold?) Therefore, when an "incel" loses a girl like her, she knows the fall is even greater, which increases her validation amongst "validated" women to a degree a man of more normal status wouldn't. It's very twisted, because, by these calculations, the more "beta" an orbiter is, the more his soul will be torn apart as she explains to him ever so nonchalantly that she thought nothing of him - and the more violent a man is torn about, the more she is validated, because that pain is proportionally related to her validation. Hence her quotation,
>it's easier to do w you guysBecause these guys are the biggest losers of society, spending their youth orbiting a far away woman; She knows she feels best when these guys are the ones torn apart! How in the world she agreed to meet up with them physically is beyond me, however, and I'm interested in that story.
