Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
[244 / 66 / ?]

Medical Tyranny n°17 - NEW BREAD EDITION

No.13065003 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
QRD]
>Utopia (2013) is a TV show that shares many odd coincidences with Covid-19:
it features the use of a bioweapon, codenamed 'Janus', comprised of a PROTEIN and ENZYME that sterilises humans

>IRL there is a class of drug called Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors:
these drugs are being used under EUA (emergency use authorisation) to "fight Covid-19"

>the coof causes inflammation along the JAK-STAT pathway leading to cytokine storm;
luckily JAK inhibitors inhibit this cytokine activity.
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1624910580473.png

>unfortunately, the most devastating side effect of JAK inhibitor drugs is...
sterility.

>Due to the virus constantly mutating, there is a difference in molecular shape between the outdated vaccines' spike proteins (S protein) and the latest circulating virus' spike proteins, so antibodies generated in response to the vaccine would not neutralize the virus' spike and may contribute to the virus survival and disease severity instead (via ADE and/or OAS).
Furthermore, it has actually been proven that you become primed with the vaccine and have cytokine storm when introduced to the real virus. This has been replicated in animals as far back in 2013 and recently in 2021 (sources below).

>Conclusion? All the elements of 'Project Janus' in the TV show have an IRL counterpart in relation to Covid:
we have [1] the PROTEIN (S protein) and [2] the ENZYME (Janus kinase), individually they are harmless but when due to Covid and EUA they 'come together', it sterilises. And thus it mirrors unmistakably what happens in the show: 'Janus'.

[THINGS TO FOCUS ON ITT]
> [1] JAK Inhibitors and their effect on ADE, Covid, and fertility.
> [2] CJD, prion disease and how it may relate to this whole 'JAK-inhibitor-ADE-fertility-crisis-scenario'.
> [3] Current evidence of VADE occurring and whether JAK inhibitors are being used to treat it (are they 'more effective' against the "Delta Variant"?).
> [4] >>327909321

1/2