>>13120824bruh. i've literally told you like 5 times. some people use fst difference, some use reproduction, some use appearance, some use geography. It's a wide range of declaring something as species or even a subspecies. That should be obvious to you that some scientists consider something a species while other consider it a subspecies. For
>>13120826Because your only definition of a species is whether it can produce viable offspring and that is just not the whole story. It is incredibly disingenuous for you to not recognize that.
>Coyotes and wolves>most fish>many different species of tigers can interbreed>polar bears and brown bears>Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern humansAll different SPECIES that can interbreed
