>>13165133You should not be so rude to me. I am having a civil discussion. It goes without saying that one should have preferences when it comes to choosing a life partner. Otherwise we might as well leave the pairing to a random lottery, no? And that would turn out very poorly. Certain aspects of one's person, such as breast size, are superficial, indeed, compared to other qualities of a person. But would you choose a mentally unstable person as a partner? No. You have a preference there. What if that instability were caused by some physical deformity, such as a tumor? What about if someone were allergic to cats, but you had a pet cat? What if you were an avid traveler, and you met someone who was wheelchair-bound? Is it superficial? Yes. But one can be entitled to those preferences still. Physical attractiveness is subjective, and whether you like it or not, it correlates with both general health and intelligence. All I have said is that from a pragmatic perspective, having small or no breasts is better than having large breasts.
