>>13371997>How do you take a picture of *anything* going 10,000mph and have it come out crystal clear?Why wouldn't you? The satellite was in geosynchronous orbit. Try taking a pic of a car moving at 100km/h while you're in another car moving at the same speed alongside it.
>It's totally inconsistent.No, it's just a different perspective.
>I'm saying they fit 2-dimensional maps (which all maps were) to a globe.Yes, because it doesn't work as 2d. You have to alter the projection, like Mercator.
>Why would you try to create an accurate *flat* earth map by starting with a globe like in your orange analogy?That wasn't the point of my analogy. The point is that if you draw something on a sphere, then flatten it, it'll be distorted. Like 2d depictions of maps are.
>>13372003Nah, my wifi isn't that strong. I can barely get it in some rooms of the same house. But say it was super strong, you'd still have half a planet in the way, which would deaden it further, even with skipping off the ionosphere.
