>>13402119Women are Aphrodite. They are beautiful, fertile, and bringers of life. They are ideal lunar beings, the opposite to the solar masculinity of the sun. Even ancient peoples could clearly see that the moon was but a pale imitation of the sun, reflecting its light during the hours of the night. But how beautiful is a night with a moon suspended in the infinite blackness of the sky?
The point is that women cannot live alone. They cannot create, they cannot build, or at least not without something first to build upon. Ever notice how when men buy a house, they care more about the foundation, the materials, the sturdiness of the house, whereas women are always more concerned with the aesthetic, the plants, the additions, the furniture, what she'll hang on the wall?
It is not that women are inferior, though they certainly are meant to be moulded and shaped by something more powerful than they. Channeled correctly, they can be the most vivid depiction of life and beauty, and they can bring your progeny into the world. Left alone and given the extensive list of rights that we have so casually extended to them in the cursed Babylon of the west, they ruin society as they have before in Demetrian societies which were all marked by one attribute: a worship of female sexuality as the primary force.
The most successful, long lasting societies were always, always marked by the solar and the masculine and the worship of a being which was male, with feminine deities providing a lesser secondary role, but not the primary role.
This cursed state results, though aphoristic, in the refusal of man to submit to the natural and Divine law that governs all of existence. We have rejected it as part of the dark age. Women are not awful, they just need to be controlled, to be put into a structure, a societal superstructure to be provided meaning from a higher hierarchy, and that is the same thing I would say for most people on earth at any given moment.
