>>13464618>I despise ANY thought of people using mythology to create the rules that govern my actions.That's irony for you.
You come across as someone that wants to throw away the very moral foundations of civilization, because you want to follow the transient moral whims of twitter.
Moral relativists are the absolute WORST when it comes to regarding legislated morality, because you dumbass midwits attempt to follow two contradictive legal/moral philosophies:
1. Do not legislate morality.
2. If it's legal, it's moral.
So instead of referencing a holy book that has proven its worth over the last 1500 years when it comes to laying the groundwork for Nation Building, you dismiss those works out of hand. You have no material reason to dismiss them, other than what they say makes you personally uncomfortable or upset (You don't want to get up early on Sunday and go to church) -- or worse, some other midwit told you that they were wrong.
Now since you have cancelled religion in your mind, you go about seeking some sort of moral foundation, because you're stupidly threw out the moral foundation which built your civilization in your own weakness, and so you cling to the next best thing -- the civilization. You venerate the laws as a moral code. "If it's legal, it's moral" you say and then you gasp when something you don't like is still legal, and it must be legislated away.
That is why godless hellholes like San Francisco come up with more crazy, insane laws than they can keep up with. They have accepted the law as their moral backbone, but it doesn't align with the current whims, and therefore the law must be updated constantly to match the capricious, idiotic whims of fad and fashion.
That is what you get, instead of the reliable, tested, and accepted laws of the Holy Books which have established lasting, powerful civilizations.
You get nations of snivelling, simpering idiots like yourself, rejecting strong foundations for fancies.
