>>13483907Let's assume for the sake of any purpose hitherto for that which is known as "the argument" (among other things) that socipathiphrenia does cause you to not understand that which shall be given a Non-exclusive, Non-nontransferable, royalty free, and perpetual name for uses defined solely within this thread, of emotion. That does not necessarily imply that levels of EMOTION such as empathy among other things, ect... will confer a lesser probability given the case that, for the sake of anything that which can be known hitherto as the argument, AND anything that cannot be hitherto known as the argument, levels of emotion of things such as empathy among other things ect... do not correlate with socipathiphrenia. You have committed the "Causation implies correlation fallacy" which undermines your greater argument, that being, that god would not allow somebody to feel emotions or something among that balled park.
