>>13490177You provided an article that states that the romans ate millet, provides no quantity which is what you were supposed to prove (2oz per year) and even proves my point that they ate meat.
>Health studies out last week heralded the modern Mediterranean diet, rich in olive oil, FISH (WHICH IS MEAT) and nuts, as a good way to avoid heart disease. In ancient Rome, however, diet varied based on social class and where a person lived.Here's a good article on what they possibly ate and in what potential quantity. There's a whole section on meat but unfortunately it's hard to track data on exactly how much they ate.
>https://www.persee.fr/doc/rbph_0035-0818_2018_num_96_3_9188#rbph_0035-0818_2018_num_96_3_T8_1075_0000Meat has always been a staple in the human diet and the industrial revolution had nothing to do with the consumption of the quantities of meat. In fact in the past people may have eaten more because they were less health conscious than we are today.
Now please tell me where you got this 2oz per year metric from. Still waiting.
