>>13528435>yea im talking about charlemagne and aquinus you fucking dolt you cant handle a conversation about more than one person?Yes, I can, however, by posting Aquinas with zero context does not connect it to your argument. In an argument, you must explain your reasoning behind bringing up something that wasn't related to the topic at hand.
>yeah lots of christians have different opinions on the jews, and the overwhelming majority of them, especially the ones with influence and power in the church, were for defending the jews and their traditions.Judenhut?
Blood libel?
Host desecration?
Judensau?
Burning of Judas?
Rhineland massacres?
Louis IX?
Lisbon massacre?
Reconquista?
Tomás de Torquemada?
Constantine and the Council of Nicea?
>the church always returns to being a lapdog for kikes in the end. The Church treated the Jews as a second class that could be expelled at whim - their goods and property taken at force, and that is ignoring the times where they ignored the unofficial massacres of Jews.
>tell me, where are the antisemitic christian institutions of today?I can say the same for white people in general. Where are all the antisemitic whites? In the modern world, the antisemitic, regardless of race or religion, are a fringe.
>pastor anderson?Don't get me started on that clown.
>it helps my side of the argument to post one of your precious saints talking about how the jews and their rites must be defended, because youre not a true catholic or orthodox if you dont agree with him.That's not how Saints work. Constantine, a Saint, in the Council of Nicea, made it a point to NOT respect Jews and their traditions. Are Catholics or the Orthodox not such because of Constantine?
