>>13667902>marx isn't agitating for revolutionWhy are you lying?
Wtf do you think e.g. "Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains." mean?
What do you think that means?
Why are you lying all the time?
Or are you simply completely ignorant, because you've trusted other leftists, who lied to you and you were too stupid and too lazy to actually check what they say?
>what you call 'left', is not a concrete thing.Oh, is this the new "ReeEeaaAaaL socialism has never been tried?"
Now it's "this isn't the ReeeaAaaaL left", eh?
>there is no 'left' or 'right' in parliament. they are all the same.What a reductionist, idiotic worldview.
So, if you believe that all politicians are the same, what else do you advocate for? Could it be "revolution"?
Do you even understand the horrors of a revolution?
The Russians lost 2.5 million people during "The Great(!!!!) War" (i.e. WW1), but they lost 10 million people during the "revolution", when socialists started exterminating everyone, who wasn't the right kind of socialist.
And then the Great Terror came. And a bit later the Stalin dystopia.
Why are you such a monster that you want socialism?
>they want socialization of the productive capital.Why do you call it "socialization" instead of what Marx used: Nationalization? (i.e. giving the state absolute power over everything)
>your later post just goes to make stupid assumptions which you are not in business to do. why not talk about the things I am talking about and not go pulling assumptions out of your assYou sound like "reeeee how dare you criticize me for being a monster!!!!!! Stop talking about how abhorrent my ideology is! Just look at the bright side, ignore everything bad."
Stop being a dogmatic ideologue.
