>>1382443Well it really isn't. You're only creating a genetic duplicate (we have tonnes of those... they're called Identical Twins/Triplets etc.)
>1. On a large scale it would result in inbreeding and poor genetic variation>2. For obvious reasons of self-interest, society can't come to a concusses on who has the right to determine which genes propagate>>1383325because, Bart Simpson, that would be playing god.
