>>13831422I don't like the daddy fetish that often comes with loli. I understand on a technical level how it works, however. The appeal of loli is mainly the innocence. There is however another aspect which is dependence. A little loli is a fragile being that needs someone to take care of her. This is where daddy fetish comes in. But it is actually a subhuman and dysgenic fetish. natural loli (ie. life before ~1600) did not make the mistake of conflating the role of the father with the role of a husband. while both took care of their respective relatives, the former did so through blood and and the latter did so through marriage (or usually by purchase from the father or conquest). Those who are unable to see this are simply fetishists rather than an appreciator of beauty and innocence. More specifically one is an dysgenic manifestation of the other. Taking care of a loli is not inherently a characteristic of the father alone, but rather an emotion drawn from the being of the loli.
