>>13973980>oh so it was good? Then why doesn't it exist anymore huuuh?They collapsed because of bad leaders by the end of their existance - they are still examples of very good realms. Let me remind you that the Romans lasted 1000 years, and the Byzantines for another 1000 as well.
>made them refuse all the advancement in physics and chemistryI haven't heard anythig about that. Source?
>one of the most unequal,Plebian cope! All of your arguments are bad!
Now ono the next thing:
>Mesopotamian city-statesThey comparatively quickly expanded and became kingdoms though.
>Republican Rome>Classical Greek city-states Not all of them were democratic, and their "democracy" would barely pass as democracy nowadays. Let me remind you that the soviet union, 3d reich and Rome also had votes held for many political positions.
>Renaissance Italy>XVII century Germany and NetherlandsIn my opinion, they just imported chinese inventions and adapted them. Printing press, paper, and gunpowder are all chinese inventions.
I am not an expert, but you're even worse
>>13974004Who is the current successor of Rome in your opinion?
