>>1406161Well, it starts by getting past party affiliation.
It's a great way to control the masses.
Instead use a general platform, people can agree to , so that no matter what party the congressman that wins his primary will agree to work with the other side for the benefit of the people.
Case examples take large grass roots movements. In a district, that has a congressman running, you have one run democrat with their belief system as long as they support a large scale oversight of federal agencies, and then the same on the republican side. Both groups of people support there individual party member - but both will have that as a platform. Meaning, on the local level, either one that wins the primary will go on to win the election (likely). After enough around the country (Aprox 30) will be enough to motivate party leaders. If 30 congressmen (and woman) are asking for the same thing, to be discussed.
Then it all comes down to individual issues.
What group is the most deserving of an audit?
CIA, The Fed, Treasury?
What groups threaten our individual freedoms the most? What forms of government haven't been working right? If there's one that everyone can point to and say "That" right there. Is not working. We can fix it. If it's an argument before it starts. Move on. Nothing will get fixed if a portion of the population can be fixated or fooled by an aspect of an issue. You target the things people actually want to fix, what resonates with them personally the most.
It's not easy, but organizing action surprisingly is.
