>>1408414>A parent's legal responsibility for their child doesn't necessarily end at 18.Under US law when a person reaches the age of 18 they are considered an adult, and can be considered responsible for themselves. The parents have no legal responsibility to do anything for them, if they chose to do so that is their decision.
>this would be an excellent moment to tearfully confess her father has always been abusive towards her.Unless you can provide evidence of a history of abuse then good fucking luck bub. No judge in civil court, because that's where cases like this end up, will take up a case based on hearsay and crocodile tears. Saying so in court is not evidence, and runs the risk of contempt. It is a waste of time.
>The social backlash should be strong enough to get him to accept a settlement.The man disavowed his daughter over text. do you really think he gives a shit what others think of him?
>If not, she can just destroy him in court. That man clearly has no self control.Again, unless you can provide evidence of abuse then no, she won't.
>That man clearly has no self control. He'd be easily provoked into racial hatred and contempt of court. According to the US supreme court "hate speech" is protected by the first amendment, if anything he'll just look like an asshole if that happens. The judge could do something, but that is up to them.
>Cases like these are a home run.No, you're just an idiot that watches too much TV and thinks the legal system is a play thing. Let's say she somehow takes him to court, there is almost no evidence of abuse and Dad keeps his cool throughout the legal proceedings. She will more than likely lose, then not only is she broke and living with a nigger, she also has to pay court fees for wasting time.
