>>1413118\>my 'logic' was that e.g. a more draconian system like China's might tell us more about the relative merits of different races in different sportsIts a useless remark that nobody cares about for 30+ posts now.
>does the historical underrepresentation of Poles in science compared to Germans or Swedes, even when they had their own state, mean that they just aren't good at science? yeah we'll go with that"Great" analogy to USA, a single country with a single system with no segregationist policy, that tries to recruit as much talent as is humanly possible. Same reasoning will tell us blacks actually aren't talented runners, it just worked out like that b/c of quirks in multiple unrelated systems, from US to many different African countries' sports industries.
Like I said, you're just awful. You make this completely mystic, unfounded judgment that there HAS to be untapped potential there, in this one group and only require evidence against it, otherwise you're adamant that you're right.
