>>1416424>i don't think they'd be driven to legislate anything too drasticIn todays world, nothing would surprise me anymore. And if they do pass something drastic, it isn't like our supreme court will knock it down. The SCoC doesn't protect Section 2 of the charter like the US courts do the first amendment when it comes to unpopular speech.
>pinning it on quebec is ludricous though it was obviously because of trumpTo be fair, just wanted to get the quebec fags mad. But it sorta back fired. But, Quebec is canadas violent step brother that always creates some sort of drama.
