[128 / 41 / ?]
Quoted By: >>14166998 >>14167000 >>14167006 >>14167015 >>14167018 >>14167026 >>14167035 >>14167036 >>14167037 >>14167039 >>14167041 >>14167051 >>14167068 >>14167083 >>14167093 >>14167098
What are the political implications for this being the most accurate depiction of jesus christ?
Its clear that from what anti-racism and neo-historical historians can tell us, that jesus was not white, did not have white skin, and may have actually been a black congolese soya bean merchant.
But what if theyre all wrong, and he didnt even have HUMAN skin?
This IS technically THE EARLIEST depiction of jesus christ, so its plausible that jesus was a donkey, a crucified donkey, maybe a talking donkey or a donkified man? (sex between mary and a donkey yahweh/product of bestiality).
ALL THESE ARE ALSO POSSIBILITIES?
Christencuckolds btfo'd.
Its clear that from what anti-racism and neo-historical historians can tell us, that jesus was not white, did not have white skin, and may have actually been a black congolese soya bean merchant.
But what if theyre all wrong, and he didnt even have HUMAN skin?
This IS technically THE EARLIEST depiction of jesus christ, so its plausible that jesus was a donkey, a crucified donkey, maybe a talking donkey or a donkified man? (sex between mary and a donkey yahweh/product of bestiality).
ALL THESE ARE ALSO POSSIBILITIES?
Christencuckolds btfo'd.
