>>14182274Well, I suppose a publicly-funded media outlet that offers individuals the opportunity to present alternative and innovative programming representative of many underappreciated communities can help to expand the range of subjects covered in mainstream entertainment, as the guaranteed income results in this broadcasting network not being dependent on revenue and profit, as is the case with other commercial television broadcasters. A network that also isn't controlled by a large conglomerate and holds a remit of fairness may also be less susceptible to bias aimed to protect corporate interests, offering the general public the ability to be fully informed of both viewpoints in each political conversation.
Oh, and uh... flag checks out... I guess.
