>>14189301If you deny genetics you might as well deny that blacks are on average dumber than whites or that women on average more average than men. It's pretty much an undeniable truth at this point.
>>14189307It's true. It may be counter-intuitive but it was confirmed by conducting adoption studies.
If you think that upbringing makes a difference then you would expect that adopted kids resemble their adopted parents more than their biological parents - whom they never met. But throughout pretty much any trait, from IQ to personality traits, and even weight, they resembled their biological parents more and only got closer to them as they grew older, whereas there was next to no correlation when it came to their adopted parents. Similar patterns could be found in twin studies, where monozygotic twins resembled each other more than their adoptive parents.
The fact that kids usually end up similar to their parents, e.g. well situated, bourgeois parents having nice kids whereas white trash parents have shitty kids, is not the methods they're applying but simply kids ending up becoming similar to their parents due to their genetic heritage.
I see however a lot of right wingers taking issue with this; which I see as an expression of liberal beliefs, such as people created equal or men being masters of their own destiny - very much unlike traditional, actual conservative beliefs that were fully aware of people being inherently different by blood, e.g. some people being born noble while others being born lowly.
In my opinion this should be seen as a white pill. No matter what kind of degenerate education the left comes up with, they are incapable of defiling people, as people will always become who they truly are, no matter how they are raised or educated.
