>>14189534>this much cope.you assume i care about you. i dont. Burn.
The fact you sit and want to ruin the faith of others tells me you should post pic of your nose.
>>14189535some exist. not all are accepted as reliable is the catch.
what is realiable is that Christ lived. The events of the time period line up with what is recoreded in the scripture. There are references from outside of scripture that speak of the events as well.
More than enough reason to just laugh at these wanna be scholars.
>>14189536you assume i care to convince you. i dont. you have already made up your mind. you are more indoctrinated against Christ than you are indoctrinated into believing something else. Which brings my next question. What do you actually believe in? Nothing? Just like poking holes elsewhere? Show nose.
>>14189540>dont tell him, he doesnt know LOLOLOLOLWrong.
By your own definition Alexander the great never existed. The first books about him dont come until what, at least 350 years after the fact. Yes. So when you discredit something from within a genration realize you just destroyed most of ancient history.
>We have numismatic, archaeological, primary and secondary manuscript evidence for Alexander. None of those things for (((Jesus))).all fake. See how easy it is to dismiss evidence you dont like? Now do you see why im laughing at you?
Ironically, we have those things, but you will say exactly what i just said about your hero Alex. Now you know why I laugh at you. You can say meaningless words, but that is all they are. Meaningless.
>>14189545>wants sourcesI want you to post nose.
>>14189549Alex didnt exist, you said so when you discredited sources from a correct time period.
>>14189574not the point. he was saying the dating wasnt good enough regarding what i had posted. When in fact we have sources much closer to the event with Christ than with Alex. Hence, by this own standard, Alex is less likely to have existed than Christ.
/thread
