>>14244104This post has an interesting pedigree. It's like one of literally 3 or 4 posts that are very, very questionable due to the possible reused nature of the text yet, these 3 or 4 posts have been somehow deemed "acceptable" on all sites where copypasta is not okay.
Okay. Why would I think this is copypasta? The text. The overuse of obnoxious words and phrases, like you see with copypasta. The autism. The implication that someone actually believes what they're typing. The semi ironic feel. YES. Original posts do all of these things. But THIS POST just screams of copypasta. Thing is, it can't be proven either way. I personally am cool with it being here. I'm not in anyway a moralfag on this topic. But it's interesting because I've seen a LOT of posts pulled on sites where the post looked not a letter less original than this one. But this one gets a pass for some reason.
After spending a few minutes here I can easily say that all of your posts is lacking of any wit or intelligence whatsoever. You believe yourself to be better than everyone else, and I can tell you right now, that that is not the case in the slightest, you pseudo-intellectual. I am much better than you. Clearly I am because I am neither pretentious, long-winded, asinine, discourteous, nor are my tastes quite as bland as yours. No, I am quite concise, and I would never stretch beyond that of my means or what I am designated to.
I'd have to say that this board is full of anonymous lurkers, attackers, and trolls, who have nothing better to do than throw their elitist opinions around in an attempt at misguided show-boating with people they'd never ever meet. But even then you manage to be the best, or should I say the worst, of the lot.
