>>14281528No, he's not right. For instance, there are some universities in the US where the majority of students are men (70% or more) the majority of those men have issues dating because there are no women. No amount of showering will fix this. At other universities the majority of students are women (70% or more) men at those universities have no issue with dating, and the women aren't mad either because they have absolutely no issue with sharing men.
Apply this same logic to a place like China or India where men outnumber women by the millions. That's millions of men who will never have sex, never marry, and never have children, because there are literally no women for them. Is it their fault? Or look at Japan and the US where there is very severe financial competition between the sexes. Women are earning just as much or more as men are (being handed a leg up through woman-only scholarships and woman-only hiring events) and you see women who absolutely WILL NOT date down. No amount of showering will fix this and the insanely Herculean task of making up the difference between you and a woman who has been handed government money HER ENTIRE LIFE is basically impossible. And it's not even your fault, you're a statistic.
Basically giving women the right to vote, teaching them to read, and giving them any political rights at all was a mistake. It was probably the single biggest mistake of the last century. It completely destroys nations. And just like in evolution, there is selective pressure on nations. The ones that can admit that women can't handle political rights will survive into the next century. The ones that keep lying to themselves, like the US, will fall into geopolitical inferiority as they continue to do things like flood their militaries and research labs with women/niggers in order to satiate the schizophrenic and hysterical demands of women.
