>>1442773It depnds on what you consider "wrong" (it is, your ethical/phylosophical personal belief).
I.e.:
- Deontologic ethicists like Kant would say that you should act the way you'd want everyone to act. And if everyone becomes cannibal, you'd get eaten by someone sooner or later. And if you love yourself, you'll see why that's bad.
- Utilitarian ethicists like John Stuart Mill would say that you should act the way it results in the most net utility/benefit to everyone. And, besides cannibals themselves, who benefits this? Perhaps, if the legally edible people gets restricted to social scums (you know, like criminals, niggers, jews and such) it could be acceptable; but that enters into why it should be "legal" or "illegal", not on why it should be "right" or "wrong".
Also, why would you want to eat a human? They stink, taste really bad (believe me). They surely are dishes way more yummy than a stinky human.
