>>14728712It means I observe, deduct and conclude.
If we were talking about legal property for instance and you and me were walking downtown and you told me "anon, I own this building" when is in fact owned by someone else (probably a jew), I would ask for prof to believe that. You could show me a domain title or deed but that only shows dominion, not property, which are different things entirely. You'd have to sell the building, change it or destroy it without going to jail for it (because you'd go in fact against the right of another). This would prove you are in property of it.
This is said of multiple things on reality. When someone manages a subject "with property", such as being a scholar of a certain science, people prove it by being so great about it, they can sustain statements with no further discussion and, specially, alter it's propositions or deductions and change the course of it.
But you cannot do this things with your body. You get sick and you need "external stimuli" to cure it. You want to change something, you have to visit a plastic surgeon and go through many procedures and be subject of many tools used by many different other wills.
The fact that people think that "my body is my own" is just another demonstration of the egotism, narcissism and vanity that goes rampant through modern society. It's because they have conscience of what's happening with their bodies and believe themselves to be an individual because they are subject of many phenomenons that are unique to them, that they think themselves as "special" and go around doing dumb things as thinking their bodies as their own.
The correct position, not just morally and objectively proposed by the observation of the world and nature, is that you are a subject of your own body too, along with the rest of the forces that control the material universe.
