>>14745546And enough with your vague babble, because you're not saying anything meaningful.
You tried to claim:
>There never have been a single genuine "grassroots" armed resistance. NeverSimple entirely false.
You now seem to be stretching to talking about how that
>THEY CAN'T WIN - THEY HAVE NO POWER!That's a different thing to whether something is grassroots.
Things develop and build, they evolve, they change overtime.
The Nazi movement of course wasn't grassroots.
US engineered a collapse in Germany knowing it would lead to revolutionary and counter-revolutionary movement.
So therefore no matter how "grassroots" the nazi movement is, is it not grassroots because financialising the German economy leading to a harsh collapse and radical movements planned?
But then there was funding from Wall Street during those developments too.
Was is it that you're actually trying to say here in this thread?
Because this
>There never have been a single genuine "grassroots" armed resistance. Neveris just wrong.
And steering that into things about how militia forces usually struggle to fight professional forces is something else, and is also a false distinction as something grassroots can develop into something professional - gradually overtime, maybe all sorts of different factions trying to ally with that movement and then becoming enemies, maybe trying to use it to their advantage, perhaps successfuly, perhaps they fail, perhaps it blows up in their face.
The OP is about Ukraine and "denazifying" Ukraine.
What is that you're trying to say about that?
Ukraine is not "grassroots", and neither is Russia "grassroots", they are both puppets of the U.S.
All European countries since WW2 are puppets of the U.S.
The U.S doesn't necessarily give all the interests in those countries orders, but it very much can pull all the strings.
Putin? Puppet.
Azov? Azov is grassroots compared to The Federation of Russia lol.
