>>14781790I don't know what shape the earth is, and i don't care.
But i know the heliocentric model is a jesuit construct, anyone looking into it will find ample evidence of this.
So anyone arguing for that model is arguing on behalf of the roman catholic church and the jesuits. PERIOD!
The reason for this model was to discredit the Bible (who the Catholic Church had lost control over due to it being translated). This is THE ONLY reason the heliocentric model exist!
Now, if the earth is round, this is a mer coincidence, because they never gave a shit one way or the other about the ACTUAL size and shape of the planet, nor the fucking distance to the sun or stars.
With this information in hand, ANY anon that is unironicly debating against FE using any of ((their)) bullshit science is a complet braindead faggot!
You either have actual evidence in the form of experiments preformed, or real observations.
Math constructed on other math that in turn is constructed by assumptions taken from thin fucking air is proof of deception, nothing more.
If FE is a psy-op, then it is a Zionist one, there would be ample reason for them to perpetrate one as it proves their religious texts AND weakens the "opposition" (every "faction" has their strings pulled by the same master, same shit as left vs right, black vs white and so on, same tactic just at a different level), even planting internationally bad CGI in NASA released images and video.
Now it would need to be multi tiered, with one level being intentionally shit to give the next level some credibility, seems far fetched until you understand that the Church pretended to be in opposition to the heliocentric model after failing to have it garner traction when they where promoting it (people mistrusted the fuckers even back then). So this sort of revers psychology shit has been done before.
And given the fact that i see the same garbage evidence on both sides, i'm thinking the earth might be fucking square or something.
