bnat... I'm under the impression that to write some stuff one needs to go down n amount of dimensions, which are corresponding to the amount of fuckery that is going on in one's head. So lets say when in your mind you visualize object that collapses upon itself going into another dimension it's kinda hard to maybe not describe(because i just did) but picture it using non-computer means. So as there are things that are impossible to describe(but maybe possible to show in mathematically generated sequence) it's only natural to step down from such phenomena to actually conjure comprehensive entirety of the idea.
So to some degree unless one is using the hmmmm generated guidelines others may not see the actual intend of the author.
Well actually if the quick idea doesn't seem fisable then maybe extensive metaphor that in the end somehow describes the initial intent is the answer