If biological life is truly so sanctimonious, why is it so easily snuffed out? May it be because the pretentions of the peasants and the cattle are only that, pretentions? You cannot escape death.
Anonymous
>>14873480 >Doesn't gets enough attention from one thread >Creates another Grow up dude
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:15:15 No. 14873499 Report >>14873494 Are you so certain that you wish to walk down this path?
Anonymous
>>14873494 why are you orbiting his ass?
Anonymous
>>14873499 >Haha I'm going to ask him some nonsensical question, that'll show him that I'm not an edgy underage retard 道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:17:45 No. 14873528 Report Quoted By:
>>14873511 I am incredibly personable and charismatic, such is why they all kneel around me.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:18:33 No. 14873534 Report Quoted By:
>>14873527 Nonsence would be 2+2=1, but what is nonsence is not something that is not understood? Is it truly that 2+2=1 is nonsence, or is it that the mind of Man is not yet capable of understanding such things?
Anonymous
>>14873511 >You can't just mock my discord friend Only orbiter here is you
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:20:46 No. 14873556 Report >>14873543 The will to survive is larger than the will to see, within you.
Anonymous
Anonymous
!!+BhVj0FRlGa
>>14873480 just when we needed you most.
where you been?
as you can see we've discovered something even lower than a bantoid.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>jaktranny calling others edgy underage retards
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14873556 >You can't just mock my discord friend 道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:23:36 No. 14873576 Report >>14873566 Oh, you know how it is, only the usual. Combat training, enraging psychopathy, culling bloodlines, that sort of thing. Pretty casual, I would say.
!!+BhVj0FRlGa
Quoted By:
>>14873576 baste, have fun.
Anonymous
meat
Anonymous
What i just wanted to tell you is to stop larping as schizo for attention, you aren't original and cool, stop degrading yourself for random retards on internet
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:27:45 No. 14873608 Report Quoted By:
>>14873592 Americans have none of those, they have 100% fat in their bodyweight.
>>14873597 The will of Getia must not be stopped merely because one simple subhuman desires as such.
Anonymous
>>14873480 Doth thy greatness remember thine humble servant and compatriot?
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:33:40 No. 14873650 Report >>14873631 I remember much indeed, but I have also forgotten much over many lifetimes. We shall see whether you are truly worthy or not...... the flag is a factor that is favourable, as is your choice of words, although the image is very unfavourable.
Anonymous
>>14873480 another fucking fake esoteric post with racist undertones from this kid? /pol come get ur man hes pretending to be a darksouls npc again
Anonymous
>>14873650 I am glad you have remembered me, even if only in fragments.
However, the night is yours; I must depart! I look forward to our meetings in the near future...
Anonymous
>>14873480 get rid of the name thing fucking tard
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:43:42 No. 14873708 Report Quoted By:
>>14873697 Indeed, may your sleep be blessed with wondrous visions and mighty conquests, lest you falter in the face of SIN. We may see each other further, we may not, but for now, farewell......
>>14873693 >>14873699 American dog.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>14873693 Lol, remember that Turkish namefag guy? literally his copy
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:44:02 No. 14873712 Report Quoted By:
>>14873709 The Roman Empire was made by the Getae.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:44:48 No. 14873717 Report >>14873710 Everything I say is 100% original and well-thought out. It is most insulting of you to say that I would copy another, when my masterworks are just that, masterworks.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>14873717 You are probably new here, you should lurk more before putting epic schizo name and larping. I understand you wanna become famous around here but if you'll just try to copy others you won't achieve much
Anonymous
>>14873480 how is life ending, in any way, an obstacle for moral objectivity to exist?
Anonymous
>>14873709 The Roman Empire was made by chad italics
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:51:45 No. 14873760 Report Quoted By:
>>14873742 I am instantly famous wherever I go, my mere heroic presence makes it as such. I know lower castes like you wouldn't know of such things, but, there is no need to be upset. You may defeat your subhuman nature one day..... or not. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA.
>>14873750 Italics are just Getae who have spurned their glorious Hyperborean origin.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:52:30 No. 14873763 Report >>14873745 Morals are only the creation of Man, if Man no longer exists, then truly, morals were never some divine truth anyway.
Anonymous
>>14873750 Italics are just gigachas who have conquered the world
Anonymous
>>14873763 morals exist for man, not by man. If he was not, but there was another creature with conscience and free will, morals would exist for that creature as well
if there is no conscience or free will, morals still exist, but has no entity to reflect itself on
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:00:48 No. 14873817 Report >>14873771 If italics are such "gigachas", why is it that they required the Getae to govern their imperium in their dying years..... and then got destroyed by them anyway. Lol.
>>14873796 Another sentient creature may see that morals are different, but Man sees morals in a very simple way: do not kill, do not steal, propagate. It is very biological and subhuman in nature and thus it makes it biologically subhuman. Your point of morals existing independent of man could be said of any idea, indeed, the idea of not killing exists without any sentient creature existing, but why is it that killing, is....... immoral? Ah ha haaaaaaa, this is only a discussion that will lead to one single point: fear.
Anonymous
>>14873771 If italics are such "gigachas", why they still own the world in my risk game? and keep winning gigachad. Lol
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:03:42 No. 14873836 Report Quoted By:
>>14873825 I'm going to invade your risk game, kid. Watch out.
Anonymous
>>14873825 I'm going to play risk with you, man. Stay winning.
Anonymous
>>14873817 If fear is the ultimate reason for being a moral creature, then morals are relative, but if so, humans would only abstain from doing what they fear because humans decided they had to fear it. If you pass a law to make homicide legal, people not having to fear killing other human wouldn't make homicide inmoral, it would be the law what's unfair
morality is more profound and at the same time, simpler than "do not". To be moral means to aspire to perfection. To be the most perfect human being that is possible. It has no ulterior motive, your existence will still end through death, but being moral is still an obligation since you come to the world and observe there are grades of perfection, from the worst to the best, only an inept would not want perfection after acquiring it's notion
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:08:11 No. 14873859 Report Quoted By:
>>14873840 Play with this 30 cm GIANT GETIC PENIS, lol.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
wouldn't make homicide moral*
Anonymous
>>14873840 Play with this pussy, chad.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:11:38 No. 14873870 Report >>14873858 Why be perfect when you could simply, be? Indeed, such things are also relative, as is everything, in its own way. To say that morals are more profound that such is to say that fecal matter is more than something to be disposed of. Why is it that fecal matter is disposed of, anyway? Is it because it has no use, it is not nutritious, it is nothing? Is it because of it uselessness, as Man sees only in useful and useless, and morals are only another facet of this conception. You can see how "shit" is an insult in just about every language, and this is because it is useless, as I have said, Man only sees in useful and useless, and morals are another part of this, as is religion, culture, and other such things. They only seek to propagate their biological subhumanity, but me? I.... am here to stop them.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:12:19 No. 14873876 Report Quoted By:
>>14873864 That would imply that you are a female, and females are too idiotic to know how to use a forum such as this, much less solve the captcha.
Anonymous
>>14873864 That would imply that you are a male, and males are too smart to don't know how to use a forum such as this
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:15:25 No. 14873894 Report Quoted By:
>>14873884 I am a supreme divine lifeform.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14873884 are you from upsidedownland
Anonymous
>>14873884 You are a supreme divine lifeform.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:16:46 No. 14873905 Report Quoted By:
>>14873899 Me? Yes. You? No.
Anonymous
>>14873899 You? Yes. Him? No.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:20:17 No. 14873939 Report Quoted By:
>>14873920 Alaric was too soft.
Anonymous
>>14873870 >Why be perfect when you could simply, be? Simply being is characteristic of the brute, be an animal that has no conscience or free will or a motionless entity, like the stone, which is already perfect just by being a stone, which is it's purpose. There are grades of perfection for human existence and that proves the existence of objective morality
>To say that morals are more profound that such is to say that fecal matter is more than something to be disposed of Sorry but I can't understand this, although when people insult others by saying "shit", they do not refer to the fecal matter in itself, but to the "waste" part of that concept, since it would make no sense to call someone else manure or compost and expect them to be insulted.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:26:42 No. 14873984 Report >>14873942 Is it you that could say that animals have no free will? How come they do not have free will, but it is Man, that does? Is it that Man is a divine creature, higher than other lifeforms..... or has he spurned his origin, and gone soft on this world? Why is it that Man does not lower his intelligence and become an animal, could it be said that he then becomes "less perfect" or that he simply, becomes? Becomes, something else. It is true that perfection is something that should be achieved, but in the end it is that Man does not want others to be perfect and only wants himself to be, for if others are perfect, then they are a threat to him. All of morality is only a perfectly cultivated construct made for those who have power to have more power and for those who are weak to be even weaker. Perfection is only achievable by those who seek it, not through morality. There are things higher than morality, and for example, things such as raping a Man or profaning your body are, indeed, immoral, but also, such things are not done by warriours of great renown not because they are immoral, but because they are above them. And indeed, on the other part, they do feel insulted because they were called "shit" because it is indeed a waste, and they are said to be waste, as I have already said previously, but also, because of the irrational part of biology, the asshole, the shit, the butt, all of these, irrational, but why not want to be penetrated and why not smear yourself with shit? It could be said that this is irrational, because, it is. But also, it is rational, because you wouldn't smear yourself with shit as you would be a diseased filth, and you wouldn't allow yourself to be penetrated as it is submitting your will to another and allowing your flesh to be desecrated.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:34:18 No. 14874032 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
>>14873984 >Is it you that could say that animals have no free will? Free will comes with the faculty to reflect about yourself, with abstract thinking. You can think abstractly about your own actions and the best choice to obtain a result. The brute can't. You can see dogs using a crosswalk but this comes to them through instinct, observation and mimicry, not abstract thinking. If animals could think about themselves and their actions, we could see them building systems like humans do, but they do not, they simply exist.
I do have to conceed that morality only applies to us humans because we became sentient and that is simply a big fat coincidence. But morality doesn't care about that, you can imagine the rules of nature as a big light in the sky and the creatures on the ground covered by a veil, only those whose veils are transparent can be enlighted by morality, but those creatures with opaques veils, although they will never reflect or ask between themselves about lack of light because they have never knew that light is, that won't matter to the light and it will still be up there. The fact that our human veils went from opaque to transparent is simply, a coincidence of nature.
>such things are not done by warriours of great renown not because they are immoral, but because they are above them
I would say just the opposite, warriors, heroes and martyrs are absolutely moral beings and is that morality that makes them such. You can kill someone if they are unfair to you because war is an extension of self-defense
>because of the irrational part of biology, the asshole, the shit, the butt, all of these, irrational in this we agree, the whole action of excreting the excrement may be some evidence that we are just living a great coincidence and morality is simply a consequence of it
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:55:34 No. 14874188 Report >>14874163 You would say that free will comes from abstract thinking, but truly, can you say that animals do not do as such? Who art thou to know that they do not? Perhaps they do, perhaps they do not, but even if they do not, they are still, indeed, free in what they do, and their will is to survive, but indeed, many of Men's wills it to just simply, survive, and this does indeed debase them to the level of the animal, as is the case of the quintessential biological subhuman. Who is to say animals haven't already built systems? You can see them hunting and gathering all the time, such is a system, but indeed, it is not as "complex" as that of Man, and indeed, another system of theirs is to submit themselves to Man for protection, as it the case of cats and dogs, but for some others, dogs are the ones who protect Man. To say that Man is simply a coincidence is to deny the divine truth of Deus, and to say that Man isn't sent from the divine is to say that this reality is only that, a reality, which, quite frankly, is true in its own way, as are many things, true and false, at the same time. As for warriours and heroes, who is to say whether they are moral or not? Indeed, a warriour such as I is most moral in my demeanour and actions, but others..... ha ha haaaaaaaa, can you say the same about the russian and ukrainian "warriours" at the Don? Slavonic subhumans, the lot of them. They only fight to survive, no heroism at all, only acting on the interests of corrupt and impure governments.
Anonymous
2/2
>>14873984 >All of morality is only a perfectly cultivated construct made for those who have power to have more power and for those who are weak to be even weaker I get that in this postmodern timeline, you can conclude that, but there are great, brave heroes in history before this ill-fated times that acted with such honor and morals, that made those with power tremble in front of the truth. This material world does not matter to it, even if the entire world and humanity subjects itself to the balance of power and weakness, to winners and losers, heroism will still be defined by something abstract, something that doesn't care about who "wins"
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 23:02:13 No. 14874212 Report >>14874198 Ha ha haaaa, indeed, it's quite true what you say. Heroism is unbound and unshackled by any pitiful morals of the modern world or religious ingrates, they always show themselves victorious, and they never falter in the face of danger. In end, it is morality that can be whatever you wish it to be? Killing is wrong? But of course. Killing everything is good? But of course. Smearing shit all over yourself while you have the flesh of a three year old boy wrapped around your penis as you suicide bomb into an orphanage? Supremely good as well, and.... heroic too.
Anonymous
>>14874188 can you say that animals do not do as such?
They don't, they do not choose, they act entirely throught instinct, even if they hunt and gather, they could do it in so much better ways (which is proven by human activity and how we became better and hunting and gathering), but they do not.
>To say that Man is simply a coincidence is to deny the divine truth of Deus This is somehow weird after stating there is no moral objectivity, to recognize the deity implies to defend it's set of rules, it wouldn't make sense to be a god without objective laws.
>As for warriours and heroes, who is to say whether they are moral or not? Their actions, if their motives are pure and perfect and those reflect on their actions - if, for instance, they do not seek revenge or bloodthirst in their killing but rather the preservation of truth and justice -, otherwise they are just cruel beings who take advantage of such a situation
>can you say the same about the russian and ukrainian "warriours" at the Don? Slavonic subhumans, the lot of them I agree
>They only fight to survive, no heroism at all, only acting on the interests of corrupt and impure governments Maybe so, but we are too deep away in this modern world, what we see today is almost entirely depravity, immorality, unvirtuous. I honestly believe only after a big reset we could conduct ourselves with honesty once again, but that is just a coincidence, morality can be reduced to ashes in practicality but it will still be out there
Anonymous
>>14874212 >it is morality that can be whatever you wish it to be? No, it is always dependant on perfection, on what is fair, virtuous and tends towards the most perfect version of humanity that can be obtained. Joan of Arc was a moral hero because her purpose was to defeat the evil of the catholic rules of her time and show to the world how the humans made them unfair, Kyle Rittenhouse was not a hero because he acted towards unfair rules, although he did act morally because he defended himself. There will always be a light to truthful morality
>Smearing shit all over yourself while you have the flesh of a three year old boy wrapped around your penis as you suicide bomb into an orphanage? kek, I think we are drifting a bit from the topic
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 23:12:07 No. 14874262 Report >>14874232 Animals do indeed choose many things, they choose whether to play with you (certainly for the benefit of their own survival as they know you are a caregiver), they choose whether or not to walk off that cliff, they choose whether they'll sleep or not, although, of course, this could be said to be instinct, but what is instinct anyway? Does Man not function off of instinct too? The heroic ones certainly do not, for they ascend to greater heights of power, they do not allow themselves to be entrapped in such pitiful things. Animals are indeed intelligent in their own way, as are Men, but in the end most organisms are idiotic cattle, as are animals too. But, who is to say that Man chooses what he does, and it is not the tethering of fate that traps him? Indeed, this is a rather null point, as whether by fate or by action, it'll happen anyway, so it's a rather useless thing to say that most thing it's so "amazing" and "deep". As for Deus, truly, there are things in this world higher than moral objectivity and relativity. Deus, being above them. We do not act out of morals, but, out of badassery. Also, your point of bloodthirst and cruelty is another part of moral relativity, those things would seem bad for you, but tell me, why is it so bad to be cruel and bloodthirsty? Because this modern world says so? No, it is because of society not being able to propagate and the bad elements being the ones to stop it.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 23:17:23 No. 14874277 Report Quoted By:
>>14874253 That is to say, heroism is something different to many I see, as are many things, different to others, faiths, creeds, religions, other such things. Many believe God to be something "good" that "protects them" and is "benevolent", some others believe other things. As for Joan of Arc, no female can be heroic as females fundamentally debased creatures, they cannot be heroic as they are purposed to only be slaves to Man. Purpose, indeed, purpose is such a vain concept, would you not agree? I forgot to say in the other post, but purpose is only the facet of morality and other such things: vain and worthless. As if worthlessness itself was worth anything, worthlessness itself in the end is worthless as well. As for Kyle Rittenhouse, neither was he a hero, of course, he was only acting out of survival, as many Men do. Animal instinct, of course, not heroic. Heroic would have been if he took action against others by his own initiative. As for drifting off topic, no, it is not at all drifting off topic, could you not say that such a thing is moral? Smearing shit and all that, why is this not moral? Because morality, is relative. But also, because heroes and badasses wouldn't do such things. And as for the perfect version of humanity, I'll only say this: the perfect version of humanity is the humanity that doesn't exist.
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ
道 卍ᛗ ⊕𐍂𐌴𐍇⳨⳩⳨֍666֎⳨⳩⳨𐌽𐍉𐍇𐌹𐍃⊙ ᚢ卐 ॐ ID:2iAu498f Mon 04 Apr 2022 23:33:51 No. 14874329 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14874262 >although, of course, this could be said to be instinct, but what is instinct anyway? Yes, it's pure instinct, in the way they do not reflect about why they do this or that, it's only gaining pleasure and avoiding pain that moves them
>Does Man not function off of instinct too? He does, but not only because of it. You can see man moving through pain to obtain a harder truth, you could say this goes against their instincts because they can thinking abstractly about their actions and how sometimes pain can be a good thing if it means to obtain something else
>But, who is to say that Man chooses what he does, and it is not the tethering of fate that traps him? Indeed, this is a rather null point, as whether by fate or by action I agree in it being a null point but the truth about this matter makes a huge, practical answer. If we do not choose, we are simply animals with a little more of self-aware, as you have putted, but if we do, then there is a natural law that enlights every moral action and judges them
>why is it so bad to be cruel and bloodthirsty? Because this modern world says so? Because morally you can only hurt someone else if it is for your own defense. You may not choose to kill the murderer of your son just by pure vengeance or spite, but because it could mean saving him, right there and then in the action of the murder, all action afterwards must be reserved for justice and court
>Smearing shit and all that, why is this not moral? Because an adult understands this can be dangerous to himself and is an attempt against his perfection because excrement can carry disease, but for a kid that cannot acknowledge this, there is still not a choice on him over smearing it so there is no morality broken
>Because morality, is relative I can see this is the only point in which we disagree, in the cause of those actions, because we value the consequences of them in the same way. It could be said this is only a theoretical difference.
1/2
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>the perfect version of humanity is the humanity that doesn't exist.
