>>15006771>You think you have all the answers.not all the answers but unlike you i realy DO my reseach outside of 1h long youtube rants
>You know less than nothing. In order to know nothing you would have to be able to let go of everything you currently know or accept it could be false in order to keep going.you sound salty. Did i hit something?
>Do you think I don't know the accepted model?do you also understand the accepted model and why its accepted?
>I know it well. I don't need to understand it better. aka "lalalala i cant hear you!"
Only a fool claims to be right (without showing the how and why)
>The problem is that everything in that model is built upon the foundation that the world is a globe. you soooo close
>If the world is not a globe, then anything that requires the world to be a globe is false.and you miss it
Do you know how we ended up using the globe over the flat earth model?
>We can start there if you like. Space does not exist.hahahaha good joke oh man what lols you make here... you are serious...
>The only place you have "seen space" is on TV.WHAT I CANT HEAR YOU I AM A MECHATRONIC ENGINEER. I ones worked on something space related... and with vacuums. So i know what thinks suck and how to stop it "leaking" stuff.
Can it be you are projecting right now?
>You have also looked up at the sky and thought you were seeing space, but thats just because it's how you were taught to see it.You try to undermine my degree in planing and building stuff. Stop hiding behind "them" and other convenient conspiracies that lead us nowhere.
>This is where you should start to get frustrated. thanks i can think for myself but i am more anoyed by you then furstrated. I realy like to help you understand but for this you need to stop talking this shit first and come to some kind of point.
>You want to talk about the science but I want to talk about the philosophical axioms that led to the science.So you dont want to talk at all? Becouse both are linked.
