>>15035745self interest
+
consequentialism.
=
a valid morality.
certain things produce outcomes that do not align with objectives that people have.
there's no reason to call certain action as morally good or bad, in fach such thing does not exist 'cause no action is independent of its consequences , they can't be measure.
to be objetive they need to have properties by themselves which do not happen. so no, morality is subjetive
and only serves those who uphold them 'cause they produce desirable outcomes.
plus your argument is self-defeating 'because you admitted that your god and religion are just savages and retards who deserve the rope 'cause your objectives do not align with mine.
see:
Slavery (Exodus 21:20-21, Colossians 3:22, Ephesians 6:5)
Blood sacrifice (Genesis 8:20)
Human sacrifice (Genesis 22:1-18, Exodus 32:27)
Misogyny (Genesis 3:16, Exodus 21:7-8, Corinthians 11:8-9)
Genital Mutilation (Genesis 17:10-14, 1 Samuel 18:27)
Genocide (Genesis 6-9, Numbers 21:3, Numbers 21:33-35, Deuteronomy 2:33-34, Joshua 6:21-27, Joshua 10)
Infanticide (1 Samuel 15:3, Exodus 11-12)
Thought crimes (Matthew 5:27-28)
Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29)
and death penalties for trivial offences! (Exodus 35:2, Numbers, 15:32-36, 2 Samuel 6:6-7, 1 Kings 13:15-24, 2 kings 2:23)
