>>15063003I don't feel intellectually superior to you,
I'm not arrogant, and I dont think you're dumb
You're just mistaken about your conclusions, I am trying to say that with kindness
I can address the substance of your image macro, but first I invite you to consider why globe earth debunkers are not motivated to set up experimentation and collate the results in a journal. Why don't they approach the question like a dispassionate scientist, and instead they approach it like an evangelical? The answer is because all flat earthers originate from skepticism towards tyranny, but go a bridge too far when they throw science out simply because the state monopolizes academia. Flat eartherism isn't new, it's popularity rises and falls in conjunction with lefty expansions of power.
As far as your question about pressure, you're comparing apples to oranges. The pressure the submarine experiences has a far higher delta between the ocean surface and it's max dive depth, than the normal atmosphere pressure's delta to the vacuum of space.
Second, the origin of pressure is the result of gravity bringing together molecules in the vacuum of space. The more molecules condense, the more pressure there is on the center molecules, as compared to the outside molecules. The deeper you go the more pressure.
Thirdly, we need capsules to visit space? Spaceships have a barrier.
If what you mean is "why doesn't a planet's atmospheric pressure dissipate into space?" the answer is it originally was dissipated, it formed into the planet via gravitational attraction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWhVWmsDlfQ this pilot is offering to do the flat earth "impossible flight", go ahead and sign up and you can run your own experiments while in flight.
This soifaggot has a good breakdown on the history of flat eartherism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwJzsE8CvzQAlso check out scimandan's catalogue on youtube.
