>>15180312i understood your post
>>15180267 but I just wonder where i made my mistake the first time
>>15180168i'm still trying to figure it out......
OH i wrote some code in python and figured it out while typing this post
basically
>axy/bis not the same as
>ax/b * ay/bcause you can multiply both by b and see it's obvious
>axy>ax * ayso there's an extra a there so obviously that wouldn't work, wow that was a bad mistake i made
but what about
>axy/bvs
>ax/b * y/b? cause using the earlier trick of multiplying both by b gives
>axy = ax * yso the earlier trick doesn't work
but basically i looked at it and realized
>ax/b * y/bis dividing by b twice
anyway that was fun thank you very much
