>>15250093I guess in a way, although not generally on accusations. Like the defense can say that the plaintiff or the prosecutor have failed to prove their case and ask for dismissal, which may or may not be granted. If I framed around you saying that being nice to me is gay I might be able to finagle something like that, but it's more due to the fact that the best and most immediately available proofs I have are outside the purview of the board and I don't really want to dig through the archive for instances of you being gay when I know you're gay and you know you're gay and everyone else knows you're gay. And I guess in that sense we can go back to the court analogy where common knowledge can be a valid source since nobody would legitimately make contention of it. Maybe we can take it a step further if that's the standard to which we're holding this subject, and I can bait you into perjuring yourself upon which it might be appropriate to exceed the purview to provide evidence of that: Are you gay?
