>>15349544Women don't fight back generally because they have a close to 100% chance to reproducing. Men had at times only a 10-15% chance of reproducing, which is why they are willing to sacrifice their health or life much more quickly. That's why in any type of mammal species, only old women, who aren't able to effectively reproduce any longer, will fight off males to protect their children. Young women will let a male kill their children to ensure their own health and the health of her future children.
About the tiny body parts: That's to a big extent preference falsification to increase status of ones family. If the average peasant or middle class woman is strong and well nourished, the upper class tries to distance themselves from them by showing off that their body has never worked a day in their life. People starving to death in Europe during the dark ages is the reason why pretty much every woman in a painting was fat at that time.
High status women at the moment are all fit not because the 'patriarchy' is getting weaker, but because low status women are getting fatter. Same concept.
One of the very few reasons female athletes have careers is that any man will think of a healthy woman as attractive, no matter if he can dominate her or not, and a woman cannot get healthier than being able to be one of the best at something.
