>>15365732Calm down mutt, you're forgetting how to write.
>>15365733>PROTO CELTICS AND PROTO GERMANICS BELONGED TO NEITHER OF THEMThey were both descended from the Yamnaya, who were themselves PIE, and used a proto-indo-european language, which contains Aryan.
We have 0 written trace so we can't say for sure if they did call themselves that, but they would be the only group of the Indo-Europeans not calling themselves Aryan, which makes little sense. So it's literally semantics.
Furthermore we've found and tested Sarmatian remains and they weren't pure Iranian at all.
>they knew it only from their iranian neighbours and didnt use it in everyday life retardFalse, plenty of words of the indo-European languages are derived from it.
>there was several ancient empires that covered both iranian tribes and greeks but greeks never called themselves aryan They never covered the Germanic and Celtic people, yet words in these languages are derived from it.
Proof it is a Indo-European word.
>because it evolved too much over the years and because of our relations with europeans unlike rest of indo-iranians who hanged with central/south asians for the last 3000 years almostAhaha, sure, Basque remained it's own language despite being encircled, but EVERY slavic language became, just like that, Indo-European, instead of remaining Indo-Iranian, despite having ample contact with Indo-Iranian speaking peoples. Very believable.
>[citation needed]You are much closer to us genetically, linguistically, culturally, than to Iranian people.
That is a fact, and everything else is cope on your part based on greek writings, when actual science disproves your claim.
>and they are not swastikas like all proto-slavic/iranian/hindu symbolism was>>15365734There are two symbols that clearly look like modified Swastikas.
Also not all Slavic symbols, or Iranian for that matter, were Swastikas;
Finally, there were plenty
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika_(Germanic_Iron_Age) 
